UTES vs. FDIS
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. UTES is actively managed, while FDIS is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTES returned 12.27%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for FDIS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
UTES vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
UTES vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and FDIS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.27 |
UTES vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
FDIS
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UTES
FDIS
-
Basic Materials
UTES
-
FDIS
-
Communication Services
UTES
-
FDIS
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
FDIS
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
FDIS
Energy
UTES
-
FDIS
-
Financial Services
UTES
-
FDIS
Healthcare
UTES
-
FDIS
Industrials
UTES
-
FDIS
Real Estate
UTES
-
FDIS
Technology
UTES
-
FDIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
FDIS
UTES vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.72 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 2.24 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum FDIS drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -39.16% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -15.50% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -27.43% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -39.16% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -39.16% | +3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -4.58% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -7.49% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 5.01% | +1.28% |
Volatility
UTES vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 6.19%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 6.19% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 13.44% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 18.52% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 23.92% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 22.32% | -2.15% |
UTES vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and FDIS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.08% for FDIS.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer