UTEN vs. UTHY
UTEN (US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF) and UTHY (US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from US Benchmark Series - UTEN tracks the ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while UTHY tracks the ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTEN returned 1.86%/yr vs -2.16%/yr for UTHY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
UTEN vs. UTHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTEN achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than UTHY's -0.35% return.
UTEN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTHY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- -2.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTEN vs. UTHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | -0.69% | 7.82% | -1.67% | -0.28% |
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | -0.35% | 3.47% | -8.07% | -2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTEN and UTHY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between UTEN and UTHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTEN vs. UTHY — Risk / Return Rank
UTEN
UTHY
UTEN vs. UTHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) and US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTEN | UTHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.61 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 1.54 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTEN | UTHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.18 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
UTEN vs. UTHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum UTHY drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTEN and UTHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTEN | UTHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -21.86% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.57% | -7.34% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -18.58% | +9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -11.44% | +8.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -10.72% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 2.91% | -1.40% |
Volatility
UTEN vs. UTHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is 1.71%, while US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that UTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTEN | UTHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 2.72% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 6.21% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 9.41% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 13.65% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 13.65% | -5.60% |
UTEN vs. UTHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UTEN and UTHY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTEN vs. UTHY - Dividend Comparison
UTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than UTHY's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTEN US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF | 4.05% | 4.11% | 4.13% | 3.62% | 1.39% |
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | 4.64% | 4.53% | 4.58% | 2.81% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, UTEN and UTHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UTHY has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to UTEN (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTEN dropped -13.36% vs UTHY's -21.86%.
On 3-year performance, UTEN leads with 1.86% vs -2.16% for UTHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, UTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UTEN has performed better with a 1.86% return vs -2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTEN and UTHY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 4.05% for UTEN.
UTEN tracks ICE BofA Current 10 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
UTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTEN and UTHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer