PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTHY vs. FNBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FNBGX's 0.02% return.


UTHY

1D
0.18%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-1.28%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
-2.05%
5Y*
10Y*

FNBGX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.02%
6M
-1.23%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
-0.54%
5Y*
-5.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
-0.02%3.47%-8.07%-2.67%
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.02%5.30%-6.18%-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UTHY and FNBGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023

0.99

The correlation between UTHY and FNBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTHY vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTHY
UTHY Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UTHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTHY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTHY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FNBGX
FNBGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FNBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FNBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTHYFNBGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.63

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

0.96

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.29

2.06

-0.76

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTHY Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the FNBGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTHY and FNBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTHYFNBGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.63

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

-0.07

-0.10

Drawdowns

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum FNBGX drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and FNBGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTHYFNBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-46.86%

+25.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-7.28%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-17.66%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.15%

-37.24%

+26.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-21.65%

+10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.74%

+0.15%

Volatility

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTHYFNBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.79%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

6.13%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

9.03%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

14.59%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

14.20%

-0.54%

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNBGX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTHY vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison

UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FNBGX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.00%3.88%3.75%3.20%2.26%2.47%3.96%2.63%2.93%0.70%
UTHY
US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF
4.63%4.53%4.58%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, UTHY and FNBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNBGX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to UTHY (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs FNBGX's -46.86%.

FNBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTHY and FNBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer