UTHY vs. XLG
UTHY (US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTHY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTHY returned -2.15%/yr vs 20.00%/yr for XLG. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UTHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
UTHY vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTHY achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 2.89% return.
UTHY
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- -2.36%
- 3Y*
- -2.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.35%
XLG
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.52M | $5.25M | $5.75M | |
| $61.04M | $60.71M | $102.52M |
UTHY vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | -3.52% | 3.47% | -8.07% | -2.77% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 2.89% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTHY and XLG is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTHY vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
UTHY
XLG
UTHY vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTHY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.10 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 3.41 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTHY vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTHY drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTHY and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTHY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -52.39% | +30.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -12.41% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.90% | -20.70% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.25% | -5.74% | -8.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -7.62% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.98% | -0.58% |
Volatility
UTHY vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) is 2.33%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that UTHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTHY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 5.03% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.60% | 11.54% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.98% | 14.75% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 18.89% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 18.92% | -5.46% |
UTHY vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTHY vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
UTHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTHY US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | 4.86% | 4.53% | 4.58% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTHY and XLG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to UTHY (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTHY dropped -21.86% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 3-year performance, XLG leads with 20.00% vs -2.15% for UTHY. On fees, UTHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XLG has performed better with a 20.00% return vs -2.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.
UTHY has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.
UTHY is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. UTHY tracks ICE BofA Current 30-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTHY and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTHY and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer