PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UST vs. TBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UST vs. TBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than TBT's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, UST has underperformed TBT with an annualized return of -2.13%, while TBT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.10% annualized return.


UST

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
-0.51%
5Y*
-6.75%
10Y*
-2.13%

TBT

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.12%
6M
7.77%
1Y
-2.58%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. TBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
-2.88%10.26%-6.19%0.16%-30.19%-7.81%18.83%13.34%-1.09%3.21%
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
3.12%-1.45%27.66%-2.42%93.29%2.86%-37.93%-22.90%4.98%-17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and TBT is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010

-0.90

The correlation between UST and TBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

UST vs. TBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UST
TBT

Financial Services

97.4%
72.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UST
97.4%
TBT
72.7%

Basic Materials

UST

-

TBT

-

Communication Services

UST

-

TBT

-

Consumer Cyclical

UST

-

TBT

-

Consumer Defensive

UST

-

TBT

-

Energy

UST

-

TBT

-

Healthcare

UST

-

TBT

-

Industrials

UST

-

TBT

-

Real Estate

UST

-

TBT

-

Technology

UST

-

TBT

-

Utilities

UST

-

TBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UST vs. TBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST
UST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TBT
TBT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. TBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTTBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.99

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.17

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

-0.35

+1.61

UST vs. TBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the TBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and TBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTTBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.13

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.49

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.07

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.33

+0.52

Drawdowns

UST vs. TBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum TBT drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and TBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTTBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-94.99%

+47.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-14.89%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-33.83%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-33.83%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

-65.09%

+17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.33%

-85.63%

+47.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-77.33%

+62.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

7.50%

-4.47%

Volatility

UST vs. TBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) is 3.10%, while ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that UST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTTBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

5.74%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

13.20%

-6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

19.76%

-10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

31.42%

-15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

28.79%

-15.61%

UST vs. TBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBT's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

UST vs. TBT - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than TBT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
2.89%3.21%4.64%4.98%0.42%0.00%0.32%2.12%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
3.49%3.65%4.09%3.49%0.47%0.27%0.53%1.42%1.71%0.84%0.64%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UST and TBT have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBT has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to UST (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs TBT's -94.99%.

On 10-year performance, TBT leads with 2.10% vs -2.13% for UST. On fees, TBT is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, UST has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TBT has performed better with a 2.10% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBT is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UST.

UST has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.89% for TBT.

UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while TBT is Inverse Bonds. UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while TBT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UST and 0.93% for TBT.

UST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UST and TBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer