TBT vs. TTT
TBT (ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury) and TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) are both exchange-traded funds - TBT is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TBT returned 3.38%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for TTT. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TBT charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TTT.
Performance
TBT vs. TTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBT achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than TTT's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TBT has outperformed TTT with an annualized return of 3.38%, while TTT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.71% annualized return.
TBT
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
TTT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 0.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.32%
- 10Y*
- 0.71%
TBT vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBT ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | 6.47% | -1.45% | 27.66% | -2.42% | 93.29% | 2.86% | -37.93% | -22.90% | 4.98% | -17.25% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 8.27% | -7.89% | 38.07% | -11.25% | 150.17% | 2.55% | -54.12% | -34.88% | 6.34% | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBT and TTT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.99 |
The correlation between TBT and TTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBT vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank
TBT
TTT
TBT vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBT | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.03 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.02 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 0.04 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBT vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBT drawdown since its inception was -94.99%, roughly equal to the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBT and TTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBT | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.99% | -94.00% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.89% | -22.18% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -49.69% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -49.69% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.09% | -81.76% | +16.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.17% | -77.29% | -7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.36% | -70.40% | -6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 12.12% | -4.41% |
Volatility
TBT vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT) is 5.79%, while UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that TBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBT | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 8.57% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 20.35% | -6.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 27.99% | -9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.30% | 46.97% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 43.18% | -14.51% |
TBT vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBT has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than TTT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBT vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison
TBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than TTT's 8.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBT ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | 2.63% | 3.21% | 4.64% | 4.98% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 2.12% | 0.99% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 8.96% | 9.87% | 4.86% | 12.15% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TBT and TTT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TTT has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to TBT (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBT dropped -94.99% vs TTT's -94.00%.
On 10-year performance, TBT leads with 3.38% vs 0.71% for TTT. On fees, TBT is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, TBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TBT has performed better with a 3.38% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBT is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.
TTT has the higher dividend yield at 8.96%, compared with 2.63% for TBT.
TBT is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while TTT is Leveraged Bonds. TBT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.93% for TBT and 0.95% for TTT.
TBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBT and TTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer