PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSCX vs. STK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSCX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSCX achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, USSCX has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 15.63%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.60% annualized return.


USSCX

1D
0.40%
1M
14.06%
YTD
23.62%
6M
21.76%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
28.50%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
15.63%

STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSCX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
23.62%17.93%30.58%34.01%-41.76%-3.45%60.62%37.84%-4.34%36.06%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between USSCX and STK is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.67

The correlation between USSCX and STK shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSCX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSCX
USSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
USSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
USSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSCX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSCXSTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.80

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

9.12

-6.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

38.55

-29.30

USSCX vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSCX and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSCXSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

5.11

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.88

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.94

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.76

-0.41

Drawdowns

USSCX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSCX drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSCX and STK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSCXSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.48%

-41.74%

-37.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-12.84%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.82%

-26.59%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.07%

-36.27%

-15.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.70%

-41.74%

-10.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-7.41%

-23.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.03%

+2.21%

Volatility

USSCX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) is 4.74%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that USSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSCXSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

8.47%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

18.91%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.65%

22.93%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

25.10%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.54%

26.13%

+0.41%

USSCX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSCX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

USSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than STK's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
7.62%9.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.49%5.36%27.99%16.68%8.31%4.15%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSCX and STK have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STK has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to USSCX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSCX dropped -79.48% vs STK's -41.74%.

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSCX and STK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer