PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 9.93%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.66% annualized return.


USMV

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.61%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.93%

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.65%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and TLT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

-0.08

The correlation between USMV and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMVTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.09

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.65

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

1.63

+0.64

USMV vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMVTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

-0.40

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

-0.11

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.26

+0.61

Drawdowns

USMV vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-48.35%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-7.58%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-19.18%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-43.70%

+25.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-48.35%

+15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-40.44%

+39.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-13.82%

+10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.04%

-1.11%

Volatility

USMV vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.38%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

2.76%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

6.50%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

9.77%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

15.87%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

14.91%

-0.40%

USMV vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USMV and TLT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and TLT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 10-year performance, USMV leads with 9.93% vs -1.66% for TLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USMV has performed better with a 9.93% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV and TLT have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.53% for USMV.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.

USMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer