USMV vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USMV returned 9.93%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for SPTM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

USMV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 9.93%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.

USMV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	2.65%	7.65%	15.74%	10.33%	-9.43%	20.85%	5.64%	27.69%	1.33%	18.91%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and SPTM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and SPTM has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMV	SPTM
Technology	30.8%	34.0%
Healthcare	12.5%	8.6%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.0%	4.8%
Utilities	7.5%	2.3%
Communication Services	5.9%	10.5%
Industrials	5.7%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	10.3%
Energy	3.6%	3.7%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

USMV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 17
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 19

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USMV	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	2.36	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	3.23	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.43	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	3.22	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	15.01	-12.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USMV vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USMV	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	2.36	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.80	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.85	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.46	+0.41

Drawdowns

USMV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMV	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-54.80%	+21.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.46%	-8.68%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.36%	-18.87%	+9.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	-24.14%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.10%	-34.66%	+1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-0.67%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-9.05%	+6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.86%	+0.07%

Volatility

USMV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.38%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMV	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	2.88%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.91%	8.92%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.50%	11.88%	-3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	16.87%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	18.03%	-3.52%

USMV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USMV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.53%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMV and SPTM in my portfolio?

USMV and SPTM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMV or SPTM?

SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, USMV or SPTM?

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 15.21% vs 9.93% for USMV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMV or SPTM?

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMV or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMV or SPTM?

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between USMV and SPTM?

USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.