PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, USMV has underperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 9.37%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


USMV

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.40%
6M
2.94%
YTD
3.23%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
9.37%
ALL TIME*
11.57%

SCHV

1D
-0.47%
1M
-2.19%
6M
9.69%
YTD
14.69%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
3.23%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
14.69%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and SCHV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and SCHV has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
SCHV

Technology

33.0%
22.9%

Healthcare

13.4%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
8.1%

Utilities

7.2%
4.3%

Industrials

6.4%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
6.5%

Communication Services

5.7%
2.1%

Energy

2.6%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.5%

Technology

USMV
33.0%
SCHV
22.9%

Healthcare

USMV
13.4%
SCHV
11.2%

Financial Services

USMV
11.8%
SCHV
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
9.3%
SCHV
8.1%

Utilities

USMV
7.2%
SCHV
4.3%

Industrials

USMV
6.4%
SCHV
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.8%
SCHV
6.5%

Communication Services

USMV
5.7%
SCHV
2.1%

Energy

USMV
2.6%
SCHV
5.8%

Real Estate

USMV
2.6%
SCHV
3.9%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.2%
SCHV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USMVSCHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.33

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

12.95

-10.21

USMV vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMV and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-37.08%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

-6.83%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-15.26%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-19.78%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-37.08%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-3.42%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-3.81%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.75%

+0.23%

Volatility

USMV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.66%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.33%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.43%

8.87%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.54%

11.21%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

14.52%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

16.92%

-2.42%

USMV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than SCHV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.50%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to USMV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.94% vs 9.37% for USMV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.50% for USMV.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.04% for SCHV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer