USIBX vs. FTHRX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX).
USIBX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 2, 1999. FTHRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 23, 1975.
Performance
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIBX USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund | -0.60% | 7.48% | 2.84% | 6.74% | -12.69% | 0.85% | 9.64% | 11.07% | -0.97% | 5.91% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.49% | 6.89% | 3.25% | 5.55% | -9.17% | -1.60% | 7.06% | 7.20% | 0.52% | 2.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USIBX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, USIBX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 3.20%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.
USIBX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
FTHRX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USIBX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USIBX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank
USIBX
FTHRX
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USIBX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.11 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 2.19 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 7.84 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USIBX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.28 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.61 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.91 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between USIBX and FTHRX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
USIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than FTHRX's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIBX USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund | 4.33% | 4.56% | 4.47% | 3.71% | 3.17% | 4.92% | 6.84% | 4.93% | 3.67% | 3.45% | 3.86% | 4.35% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.35% | 3.59% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 1.55% | 1.53% | 4.16% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 2.20% | 2.63% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIBX drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIBX and FTHRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USIBX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -19.01% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.11% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.49% | -13.18% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.49% | -13.25% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -1.72% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -3.07% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.59% | +0.34% |
Volatility
USIBX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 1.11%. This indicates that USIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USIBX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.11% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 1.84% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 3.08% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 4.00% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 3.39% | +1.31% |