PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFR vs. FLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFR vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, USFR has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.50% annualized return.


USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.96%
1Y
4.01%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.47%

FLTR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.48%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFR vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.60%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
1.95%5.22%7.38%7.41%0.74%0.55%1.44%5.70%0.30%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between USFR and FLTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFR vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTR
FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFR vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USFRFLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+37.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

13.37

3.15

+10.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

202.38

16.96

+185.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

783.80

101.22

+682.58

USFR vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFR Sharpe Ratio is 15.01, which is higher than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFR and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USFRFLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01

6.77

+8.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

9.25

2.12

+7.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

3.07

0.70

+2.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.53

+1.08

Drawdowns

USFR vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and FLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFRFLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-17.84%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.31%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

-1.93%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.18%

-3.06%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.80%

-17.84%

+17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.67%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.05%

-0.04%

Volatility

USFR vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.06%, while VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a volatility of 0.25%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFRFLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.25%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

0.62%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27%

0.79%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.40%

2.13%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.81%

5.00%

-4.19%

USFR vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USFR vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTR
VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.73%4.97%5.93%6.07%2.29%0.63%1.49%3.05%2.67%1.69%1.16%0.71%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFR and FLTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTR has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFR dropped -1.36% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

On 10-year performance, FLTR leads with 3.50% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 3.50% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.

USFR is categorized as Government Bonds, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR and 0.14% for FLTR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs 6.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFR and FLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer