PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFI vs. BINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFI vs. BINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFI achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BINT's 10.07% return.


USFI

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.09%
6M
0.39%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.79%

BINT

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.64%
6M
3.89%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$969.85K$1.17M$1.77M
$228.87$276.61$7.08K

USFI vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USFI and BINT is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFI vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USFI
USFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BINT
BINT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USFI vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USFIBINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.95

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

7.59

+0.73

USFI vs. BINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the BINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFI and BINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USFI vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFI drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, smaller than the maximum BINT drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFI and BINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFIBINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-10.94%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-10.94%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-5.79%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-1.64%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

2.81%

-2.34%

Volatility

USFI vs. BINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) is 0.80%, while Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that USFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFIBINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

4.50%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

14.17%

-12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

16.10%

-12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

15.68%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.85%

15.68%

-8.83%

USFI vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BINT's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

USFI vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison

USFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than BINT's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
1.81%1.08%0.00%0.00%
USFI
BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF
4.46%4.42%4.60%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFI and BINT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BINT has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to USFI (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFI dropped -8.47% vs BINT's -10.94%.

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 21.27% vs 3.87% for USFI. On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, USFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 21.27% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for USFI.

USFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.81% for BINT.

USFI is categorized as Actively Managed, while BINT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for USFI and 0.23% for BINT.

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFI and BINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer