PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEW vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEW vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USEW having a 11.02% return and GXLC slightly higher at 11.30%.


USEW

1D
0.29%
1M
2.79%
6M
8.79%
YTD
11.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
0.44%
1M
2.11%
6M
9.40%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEW vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
USEW
Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF
11.02%0.51%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
11.30%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between USEW and GXLC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEW vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

USEW vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEW vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEW drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum GXLC drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEW and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEWGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-9.08%

+1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.56%

+0.32%

Volatility

USEW vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEWGXLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

13.61%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

13.61%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

13.61%

-0.92%

USEW vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USEW vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

USEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than GXLC's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.63%0.30%
USEW
Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF
0.55%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, USEW and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USEW.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.55% for USEW.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USEW and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEW and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer