USEW vs. BUFH

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

USEW (Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

USEW vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEW achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.78% return.

USEW

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 7.64%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BUFH

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 2.49%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	$329.65K	$254.20K	$192.97K
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF	$13.66K	$11.09K	$11.76K

USEW vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF	9.76%	0.51%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.78%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between USEW and BUFH is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

USEW vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH

BUFH Risk / Return Rank: 92
BUFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BUFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BUFH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BUFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BUFH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEW vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USEW	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.38	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.30	—

Drawdowns

USEW vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEW drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEW and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	USEW	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.85%	-1.53%	-6.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.19%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-0.17%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USEW	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	2.38%	+10.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.38%	2.32%	+10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.38%	2.32%	+10.06%

USEW vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

USEW vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

USEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF	0.56%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USEW and BUFH in my portfolio?

USEW and BUFH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USEW or BUFH?

On fees, USEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USEW or BUFH?

USEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USEW or BUFH?

USEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between USEW and BUFH?

USEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USEW and 0.95% for BUFH.