PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEW vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEW vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEW achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.


USEW

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.91%
YTD
8.83%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDGS

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.65%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEW vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
USEW
Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF
8.83%0.77%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
5.64%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between USEW and BDGS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEW vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEW

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEW vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

USEW vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USEWBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

1.76

+0.05

Drawdowns

USEW vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEW drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEW and BDGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEWBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-9.12%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.83%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-0.64%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

Volatility

USEW vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEWBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

6.08%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

8.21%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

8.21%

+4.48%

USEW vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEW vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

USEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than BDGS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.52%0.55%1.81%0.84%
USEW
Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF
0.50%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USEW and BDGS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.50% for USEW.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USEW and 0.87% for BDGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEW and BDGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer