PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USD vs. XPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USD vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 81.60% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -21.53% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 59.63%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.67% annualized return.


USD

1D
7.41%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
81.60%
6M
69.12%
1Y
218.18%
3Y*
115.96%
5Y*
65.20%
10Y*
59.63%

XPP

1D
-0.06%
1M
-13.81%
YTD
-21.53%
6M
-24.53%
1Y
-14.32%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
-20.38%
10Y*
-5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USD vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
81.60%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
-21.53%45.84%38.18%-34.77%-50.06%-40.45%7.07%24.88%-31.36%80.21%

Correlation

The correlation between USD and XPP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009

0.49

The correlation between USD and XPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USD vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USD
XPP

Financial Services

28.0%
43.8%

Technology

26.7%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

USD
28.0%
XPP
43.8%

Technology

USD
26.7%
XPP

-

Energy

USD
0.0%
XPP

-

Basic Materials

USD

-

XPP

-

Communication Services

USD

-

XPP

-

Consumer Cyclical

USD

-

XPP

-

Consumer Defensive

USD

-

XPP

-

Healthcare

USD

-

XPP

-

Industrials

USD

-

XPP

-

Real Estate

USD

-

XPP

-

Utilities

USD

-

XPP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USD vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XPP
XPP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USD vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDXPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.97

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.91

-0.42

+7.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.73

-0.88

+20.61

USD vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USD Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USD and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDXPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

-0.37

+3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

-0.33

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

-0.10

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.10

+0.57

Drawdowns

USD vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and XPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDXPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-89.90%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

-33.95%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

-52.95%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.85%

-85.24%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

-89.90%

+12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.10%

-79.23%

+63.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-47.84%

+15.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

16.35%

-5.24%

Volatility

USD vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 28.47% compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) at 13.71%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDXPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.47%

13.71%

+14.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.89%

29.06%

+21.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.16%

39.35%

+24.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.00%

62.77%

+14.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.51%

54.92%

+14.59%

USD vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USD and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

USD vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than XPP's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.25%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
2.76%2.32%2.96%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.81%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USD and XPP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to XPP (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs XPP's -89.90%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 59.63% vs -5.67% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 13.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 59.63% return vs -5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USD and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.25% for USD.

USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USD and XPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer