USD vs. XPP
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while XPP is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USD returned 55.50%/yr vs -6.62%/yr for XPP. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
USD vs. XPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 58.94% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -19.65% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 55.50%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -6.62% annualized return.
USD
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -23.32%
- 6M
- 44.94%
- YTD
- 58.94%
- 1Y
- 100.99%
- 3Y*
- 97.07%
- 5Y*
- 57.89%
- 10Y*
- 55.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 28.48%
XPP
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- 6M
- -23.23%
- YTD
- -19.65%
- 1Y
- -20.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- -18.36%
- 10Y*
- -6.62%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.11%
USD vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 58.94% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | -19.65% | 45.84% | 38.18% | -34.77% | -50.06% | -40.45% | 7.07% | 24.88% | -31.36% | 80.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and XPP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009 | 0.49 |
The correlation between USD and XPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USD vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
XPP
Technology
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USD
XPP
-
Financial Services
USD
XPP
Energy
USD
XPP
-
Basic Materials
USD
-
XPP
-
Communication Services
USD
-
XPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
XPP
-
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
XPP
-
Healthcare
USD
-
XPP
-
Industrials
USD
-
XPP
-
Real Estate
USD
-
XPP
-
Utilities
USD
-
XPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank
USD
XPP
USD vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USD | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | -0.45 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | -0.97 | +9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USD vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and XPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -89.90% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.80% | -44.78% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | -52.95% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | -82.87% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | -89.90% | +12.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.57% | -78.74% | +52.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.24% | -48.04% | +15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 20.77% | -8.22% |
Volatility
USD vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 29.84% compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) at 12.90%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | XPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.84% | 12.90% | +16.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.46% | 29.55% | +28.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.29% | 40.24% | +31.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.30% | 62.82% | +15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.12% | 54.80% | +15.32% |
USD vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USD and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
USD vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than XPP's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.60% | 2.32% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and XPP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.84%) compared to XPP (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs XPP's -89.90%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 55.50% vs -6.62% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 12.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 55.50% return vs -6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
XPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.36% for USD.
USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XPP is China Equities. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USD and XPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer