USD vs. ROM
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%) while ROM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USD returned 60.21%/yr vs 41.18%/yr for ROM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
USD vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 86.87% return, which is significantly higher than ROM's 55.79% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed ROM with an annualized return of 60.21%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively lower 41.18% annualized return.
USD
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 86.87%
- 6M
- 97.77%
- 1Y
- 222.89%
- 3Y*
- 111.11%
- 5Y*
- 65.02%
- 10Y*
- 60.21%
ROM
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 55.79%
- 6M
- 56.08%
- 1Y
- 116.71%
- 3Y*
- 50.34%
- 5Y*
- 27.36%
- 10Y*
- 41.18%
USD vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 86.87% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 55.79% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and ROM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between USD and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
USD vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
ROM
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
USD
ROM
Technology
USD
ROM
Energy
USD
ROM
Basic Materials
USD
-
ROM
-
Communication Services
USD
-
ROM
-
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
ROM
-
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
ROM
-
Healthcare
USD
-
ROM
-
Industrials
USD
-
ROM
Real Estate
USD
-
ROM
-
Utilities
USD
-
ROM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
USD
ROM
USD vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.36 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.58 | 3.42 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.43 | 10.16 | +8.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USD vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than ROM's maximum drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -83.36% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.80% | -32.33% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | -48.10% | -16.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | -67.55% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | -67.55% | -10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.67% | -14.10% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -20.86% | -11.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.34% | 10.88% | +0.46% |
Volatility
USD vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 29.56% compared to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) at 22.20%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.56% | 22.20% | +7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.44% | 38.08% | +14.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.34% | 45.31% | +20.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.19% | 52.17% | +25.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.61% | 50.11% | +19.50% |
USD vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USD and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
USD vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than ROM's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and ROM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to ROM (22.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs ROM's -83.36%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 60.21% vs 41.18% for ROM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, ROM has been the lower-risk option at 22.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 60.21% return vs 41.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD and ROM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
USD has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.16% for ROM.
USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USD and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer