USD vs. FNGS
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USD returned 65.02%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.
Performance
USD vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 86.87% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.
USD
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 86.87%
- 6M
- 97.77%
- 1Y
- 207.86%
- 3Y*
- 111.11%
- 5Y*
- 65.02%
- 10Y*
- 60.21%
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
USD vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 86.87% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 11.63% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 6.79% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and FNGS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between USD and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
USD vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
FNGS
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
USD
FNGS
Technology
USD
FNGS
Energy
USD
FNGS
-
Basic Materials
USD
-
FNGS
-
Communication Services
USD
-
FNGS
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
FNGS
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
FNGS
-
Healthcare
USD
-
FNGS
-
Industrials
USD
-
FNGS
-
Real Estate
USD
-
FNGS
-
Utilities
USD
-
FNGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
USD
FNGS
USD vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.58 | 0.75 | +5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.43 | 2.12 | +16.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USD vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -48.98% | -39.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.80% | -22.93% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | -26.77% | -37.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | -48.98% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.67% | -9.63% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -10.85% | -21.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.34% | 8.05% | +3.29% |
Volatility
USD vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 29.56% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.56% | 8.74% | +20.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.44% | 17.19% | +35.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.34% | 21.65% | +43.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.19% | 30.10% | +47.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.61% | 31.17% | +38.44% |
USD vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
USD vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and FNGS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
On 5-year performance, USD leads with 65.02% vs 19.76% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USD has performed better with a 65.02% return vs 19.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.
USD has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.
USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.58% for FNGS.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USD and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer