USCCX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

USCCX (USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Victory. Over the past 10 years, USCCX returned 4.94%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for USBLX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCCX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

USCCX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCCX achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than USBLX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, USCCX has underperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.

USCCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 3.86%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 10.99%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 17.70%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 6.85%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCCX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund	3.86%	10.98%	5.80%	9.35%	-10.84%	4.33%	8.79%	12.12%	-3.25%	8.12%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	6.50%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between USCCX and USBLX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012	0.69

The correlation between USCCX and USBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USCCX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCCX

USCCX Risk / Return Rank: 83
USCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
USCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
USCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
USCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
USCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 84
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCCX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCCX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.89	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	4.16	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.55	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	3.43	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.44	16.86	-1.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCCX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCCX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCCX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.89	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.80	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.06	0.91	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.82	+0.29

Drawdowns

USCCX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCCX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, smaller than the maximum USBLX drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCCX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCCX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.15%	-33.49%	+18.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.21%	-5.24%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.37%	-11.66%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.15%	-20.51%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.15%	-21.93%	+6.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-4.30%	+2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	1.07%	-0.35%

Volatility

USCCX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) is 1.52%, while USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that USCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCCX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	1.77%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.15%	4.87%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	6.23%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.18%	8.65%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	9.09%	-4.41%

USCCX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCCX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCCX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

USCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than USBLX's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.01%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund	4.69%	4.81%	4.36%	3.76%	4.16%	3.94%	4.06%	2.67%	3.04%	2.88%	3.18%	3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCCX and USBLX in my portfolio?

USCCX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCCX or USBLX?

USBLX has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to USCCX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCCX dropped -15.15% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.