USCCX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
USCCX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
USCCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USCCX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | -0.36% | 10.98% | 5.80% | 9.35% | -10.84% | 4.33% | 8.79% | 12.12% | -3.25% | 8.12% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCCX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, USCCX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.79%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
USCCX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCCX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCCX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
USCCX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
USCCX
VOO
USCCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.98 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 1.50 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.53 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 7.29 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.98 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.78 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.83 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between USCCX and VOO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
USCCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
USCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | 4.89% | 4.81% | 4.36% | 3.76% | 4.16% | 3.94% | 4.06% | 2.67% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.18% | 3.79% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
USCCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCCX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCCX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -33.99% | +18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -11.98% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.15% | -24.52% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.15% | -33.99% | +18.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -6.29% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -3.72% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 2.52% | -1.74% |
Volatility
USCCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) is 1.76%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that USCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USCCX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 5.29% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 9.44% | -6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52% | 18.10% | -13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.14% | 16.82% | -11.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 17.99% | -13.35% |