USCCX vs. SICIX
USCCX (USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund) and SICIX (SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, USCCX returned 4.96%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for SICIX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCCX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for SICIX.
Performance
USCCX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCCX achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, USCCX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.43% annualized return.
USCCX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
SICIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
USCCX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | 3.80% | 10.98% | 5.80% | 9.35% | -10.84% | 4.33% | 8.79% | 12.12% | -3.25% | 8.12% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.01% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCCX and SICIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between USCCX and SICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCCX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
USCCX
SICIX
USCCX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USCCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.42 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 9.28 | +4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USCCX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCCX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCCX and SICIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -27.62% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -2.65% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.37% | -3.21% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.15% | -10.94% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.15% | -11.61% | -3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.79% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -3.56% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.69% | +0.05% |
Volatility
USCCX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.80%. This indicates that USCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCCX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 0.80% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 2.19% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19% | 2.86% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 3.89% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 3.91% | +0.79% |
USCCX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCCX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCCX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
USCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than SICIX's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | 4.73% | 4.81% | 4.36% | 3.76% | 4.16% | 3.94% | 4.06% | 2.67% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.18% | 3.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCCX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USCCX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to SICIX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCCX dropped -15.15% vs SICIX's -27.62%.
USCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCCX and SICIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer