USCA vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USCA tracks the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 20.91%/yr vs 22.16%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

USCA vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 22.16%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.57%	16.93%	23.87%	17.57%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and SPTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023	0.97

The correlation between USCA and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	SPTM
Technology	29.4%	34.0%
Financial Services	13.6%	12.1%
Communication Services	12.7%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	10.3%
Healthcare	10.7%	8.6%
Industrials	7.0%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.8%
Energy	3.5%	3.7%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.0%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 74
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.41	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.29	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.30	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	15.38	-7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.41	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.46	+1.04

Drawdowns

USCA vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-54.80%	+35.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-8.68%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-18.87%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.25%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-9.05%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	1.86%	+0.72%

Volatility

USCA vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	2.82%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	8.93%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	11.87%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	16.86%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	18.03%	-3.28%

USCA vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USCA vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SPTM's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, USCA and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, USCA or SPTM?

USCA has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to SPTM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or SPTM?

On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 22.16% vs 20.91% for USCA. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or SPTM?

Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 22.16% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for USCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or SPTM?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.03% for SPTM.

What is the main difference between USCA and SPTM?

USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.