USCA vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USCA is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 18.72%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for BDGS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

USCA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 4.21% return.

USCA

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 4.21%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 11.63%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	3.65%	14.24%	27.24%	18.41%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.21%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and BDGS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.79

The correlation between USCA and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	BDGS
Technology	41.9%	37.4%
Communication Services	12.2%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	10.9%
Healthcare	9.0%	7.5%
Financial Services	8.9%	9.3%
Industrials	6.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	4.1%
Energy	1.9%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.5%
Utilities	1.7%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.5%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 36
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USCA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.84	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.75	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.37	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.90	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	12.72	-6.81

USCA vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USCA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-9.12%	-10.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-4.03%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-9.12%	-10.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-2.17%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-0.66%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	0.92%	+1.75%

Volatility

USCA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that USCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	2.30%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	5.17%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	6.38%	+6.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	8.22%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	8.22%	+6.63%

USCA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.15%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and BDGS in my portfolio?

USCA and BDGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or BDGS?

USCA has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 18.72% vs 13.42% for BDGS. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or BDGS?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or BDGS?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between USCA and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.