PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCA vs. FGDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USCA vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USCA vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
-5.85%14.24%27.24%19.92%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
10.02%64.15%27.31%1.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a -5.85% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 10.02% return.


USCA

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-5.85%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGDL

1D
1.93%
1M
-10.91%
YTD
10.02%
6M
22.55%
1Y
52.44%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCA vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

USCA vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCAFGDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.88

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

2.29

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.34

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.68

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.11

9.56

-5.45

USCA vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the FGDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and FGDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCAFGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.88

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.55

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and FGDL is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

USCA vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.23%1.14%1.22%1.15%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

USCA vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FGDL drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and FGDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USCAFGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-19.23%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-19.23%

+7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-12.10%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-3.35%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

5.39%

-2.37%

Volatility

USCA vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 5.21%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USCAFGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

10.10%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

24.42%

-14.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

28.02%

-9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

18.97%

-4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

18.97%

-4.04%