USCA vs. FGDL
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL).
USCA and FGDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USCA is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 3, 2023. FGDL is a passively managed fund by Franklin that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Jun 30, 2022. Both USCA and FGDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USCA or FGDL.
Correlation
The correlation between USCA and FGDL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
USCA vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
USCA:
2.01
FGDL:
3.13
USCA:
2.74
FGDL:
3.93
USCA:
1.37
FGDL:
1.53
USCA:
2.95
FGDL:
5.91
USCA:
12.14
FGDL:
16.16
USCA:
2.11%
FGDL:
2.97%
USCA:
12.79%
FGDL:
15.38%
USCA:
-9.98%
FGDL:
-11.26%
USCA:
0.00%
FGDL:
-0.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 12.11% return.
USCA
4.76%
3.05%
11.55%
25.49%
N/A
N/A
FGDL
12.11%
8.64%
17.21%
46.33%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCA vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USCA vs. FGDL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
USCA
FGDL
USCA vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USCA vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
USCA vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -9.98%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -11.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and FGDL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USCA vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 2.66%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.