USCA vs. QQMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 18.72%/yr vs 27.06%/yr for QQMG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQMG.

Performance

USCA vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQMG's 17.04% return.

USCA

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQMG

• 1D: -3.20%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 17.04%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 37.07%
• 3Y*: 27.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	3.65%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.04%	22.16%	25.66%	28.64%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and QQMG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.90

The correlation between USCA and QQMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	QQMG
Technology	41.9%	63.1%
Communication Services	12.2%	13.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	11.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	3.4%
Financial Services	8.9%	0.2%
Industrials	6.6%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	5.6%
Energy	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Utilities	1.7%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.4%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 36
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USCA	QQMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.00	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.61	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.94	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	10.60	-4.69

USCA vs. QQMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QQMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and QQMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USCA vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum QQMG drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and QQMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	QQMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-35.43%	+16.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-12.67%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-22.79%	+3.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-4.36%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-9.53%	+7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	3.51%	-0.84%

Volatility

USCA vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 4.78%, while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	QQMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	9.05%	-4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	15.10%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	18.67%	-6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	23.79%	-8.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	23.79%	-8.94%

USCA vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USCA vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than QQMG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.37%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.15%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and QQMG in my portfolio?

USCA and QQMG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or QQMG?

QQMG has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to USCA (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs QQMG's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or QQMG?

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 27.06% vs 18.72% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or QQMG?

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 27.06% return vs 18.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or QQMG?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or QQMG?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.37% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between USCA and QQMG?

USCA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQMG is Nasdaq-100. USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.20% for QQMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.