USCA vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 20.91%/yr vs 29.43%/yr for DBJP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

USCA vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 20.90% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBJP

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 20.90%
• 6M: 23.04%
• 1Y: 54.21%
• 3Y*: 29.43%
• 5Y*: 21.52%
• 10Y*: 16.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	20.90%	29.51%	25.53%	23.49%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and DBJP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023	0.56

The correlation between USCA and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	DBJP
Technology	29.4%	19.1%
Financial Services	13.6%	17.5%
Communication Services	12.7%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	12.2%
Healthcare	10.7%	6.3%
Industrials	7.0%	26.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.6%
Energy	3.5%	1.1%
Utilities	2.4%	1.1%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.0%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 88
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.92	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.99	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.52	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	5.24	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	20.44	-12.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.92	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.68	+0.81

Drawdowns

USCA vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and DBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-31.30%	+12.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-10.39%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-21.50%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-7.29%	+5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	2.66%	-0.08%

Volatility

USCA vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 2.85%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	3.53%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	13.79%	-4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	18.68%	-6.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	18.93%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	19.46%	-4.71%

USCA vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCA vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DBJP's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	2.33%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and DBJP in my portfolio?

USCA and DBJP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or DBJP?

DBJP has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or DBJP?

On 3-year performance, DBJP leads with 29.43% vs 20.91% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or DBJP?

Over the 3-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 29.43% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or DBJP?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or DBJP?

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.08% for USCA.

What is the main difference between USCA and DBJP?

USCA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.45% for DBJP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.