USB vs. TFC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC).

Performance

USB vs. TFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

USB vs. TFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USB U.S. Bancorp	-1.52%	16.48%	15.62%	4.79%	-19.13%	24.32%	-17.85%	33.62%	-12.36%	6.61%
TFC Truist Financial Corporation	-5.64%	19.05%	23.72%	-8.59%	-23.53%	26.08%	-11.16%	34.55%	-10.24%	8.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap USB : $80.93B TFC : $59.08B
EPS USB : $4.86 TFC : $4.09
PE Ratio USB : 10.69 TFC : 11.25
PS Ratio USB : 1.89 TFC : 1.96
PB Ratio USB : 1.39 TFC : 0.98
Total Revenue (TTM) USB : $42.86B TFC : $30.44B
Gross Profit (TTM) USB : $26.93B TFC : $18.94B
EBITDA (TTM) USB : $10.29B TFC : $7.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USB achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly higher than TFC's -5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, USB has underperformed TFC with an annualized return of 6.30%, while TFC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.45% annualized return.

USB

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -3.87%
• YTD: -1.52%
• 6M: 9.78%
• 1Y: 28.41%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: 6.30%

TFC

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -6.77%
• YTD: -5.64%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: -0.29%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

USB vs. TFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USB

USB Risk / Return Rank: 74
USB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
USB Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
USB Omega Ratio Rank: 71
USB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
USB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

TFC

TFC Risk / Return Rank: 61
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USB vs. TFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USB	TFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.60	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	0.95	+0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.14	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	0.92	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	2.66	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USB vs. TFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USB Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the TFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USB and TFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USB	TFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	0.60	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.01	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.22	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.28	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between USB and TFC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

USB vs. TFC - Dividend Comparison

USB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than TFC's 4.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USB U.S. Bancorp	3.96%	3.82%	4.14%	4.46%	4.31%	3.13%	3.61%	2.66%	2.93%	2.16%	2.08%	2.37%
TFC Truist Financial Corporation	4.52%	4.23%	4.79%	5.63%	4.65%	3.18%	3.76%	3.04%	3.60%	2.53%	2.45%	2.78%

Drawdowns

USB vs. TFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USB drawdown since its inception was -92.31%, which is greater than TFC's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USB and TFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	USB	TFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.31%	-66.56%	-25.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.21%	-20.67%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.13%	-59.11%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.13%	-59.11%	+6.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.42%	-16.80%	+3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.28%	-13.85%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	7.17%	-0.96%

Volatility

USB vs. TFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Bancorp (USB) is 5.57%, while Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that USB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USB	TFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	7.34%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.40%	17.45%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.62%	28.53%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.74%	31.85%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.23%	33.57%	-3.34%

Financials

USB vs. TFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between U.S. Bancorp and Truist Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

USB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 7.34B and revenue of 10.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.9%.

TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.25B and revenue of 7.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.5%.

USB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.53B and revenue of 10.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 7.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

USB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 2.05B and revenue of 10.98B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 7.66B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.