PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USB vs. KEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

USB vs. KEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Bancorp (USB) and KeyCorp (KEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USB achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than KEY's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, USB has underperformed KEY with an annualized return of 7.82%, while KEY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.


USB

1D
0.93%
1M
7.02%
YTD
11.11%
6M
9.09%
1Y
41.30%
3Y*
28.40%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
7.82%

KEY

1D
1.06%
1M
6.94%
YTD
12.81%
6M
9.78%
1Y
47.25%
3Y*
41.78%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USB vs. KEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USB
U.S. Bancorp
11.11%16.48%15.62%4.79%-19.13%24.32%-17.85%33.62%-12.36%6.61%
KEY
KeyCorp
12.81%26.22%25.34%-11.53%-21.69%45.92%-14.50%42.72%-24.61%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between USB and KEY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.62

The correlation between USB and KEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USB:

$91.25B

KEY:

$24.75B

EPS

USB:

$5.02

KEY:

$1.78

PE Ratio

USB:

11.69

KEY:

12.85

PS Ratio

USB:

2.11

KEY:

2.23

PB Ratio

USB:

1.55

KEY:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

USB:

$43.34B

KEY:

$11.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

USB:

$27.22B

KEY:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

USB:

$10.34B

KEY:

$2.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USB vs. KEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USB
USB Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
USB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
USB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
USB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
USB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KEY
KEY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
KEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USB vs. KEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Bancorp (USB) and KeyCorp (KEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USBKEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.67

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

7.26

-0.93

USB vs. KEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USB Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the KEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USB and KEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USB vs. KEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USB drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, smaller than the maximum KEY drawdown of -87.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USB and KEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBKEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.08%

-87.08%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.21%

-17.76%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-32.21%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.13%

-65.23%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.13%

-65.23%

+13.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

0.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.62%

-32.85%

+17.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

6.52%

+0.02%

Volatility

USB vs. KEY - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Bancorp (USB) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to KeyCorp (KEY) at 6.39%. This indicates that USB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBKEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

6.39%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

16.95%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

23.88%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.77%

37.92%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.34%

39.82%

-9.48%

Dividends

USB vs. KEY - Dividend Comparison

USB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than KEY's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEY
KeyCorp
3.59%3.97%4.78%5.69%4.54%3.24%4.51%3.51%3.82%1.88%1.81%3.83%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
3.51%3.82%4.14%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%

Financials

USB vs. KEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between U.S. Bancorp and KeyCorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
10.84B
2.73B
(USB) Total Revenue
(KEY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USB vs. KEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between U.S. Bancorp and KeyCorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.7%
67.4%
Portfolio components
USB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 6.68B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

KEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a gross profit of 1.84B and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.4%.

USB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.69B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.

KEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported an operating income of 701.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

USB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 1.95B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.

KEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KeyCorp reported a net income of 522.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


USB and KEY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USB has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to KEY (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USB dropped -76.08% vs KEY's -87.08%.

KEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USB and KEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer