PortfoliosLab logo
USB vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between USB and BAC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

USB vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

USB:

0.44

BAC:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

USB:

0.75

BAC:

1.05

Omega Ratio

USB:

1.10

BAC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

USB:

0.37

BAC:

0.69

Martin Ratio

USB:

1.04

BAC:

2.07

Ulcer Index

USB:

11.62%

BAC:

9.18%

Daily Std Dev

USB:

29.72%

BAC:

28.96%

Max Drawdown

USB:

-76.08%

BAC:

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

USB:

-17.30%

BAC:

-5.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USB:

$69.99B

BAC:

$336.60B

EPS

USB:

$4.04

BAC:

$3.37

PE Ratio

USB:

11.12

BAC:

13.26

PEG Ratio

USB:

1.66

BAC:

1.68

PS Ratio

USB:

2.76

BAC:

3.45

PB Ratio

USB:

1.30

BAC:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

USB:

$42.60B

BAC:

$123.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

USB:

$25.36B

BAC:

$78.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

USB:

$9.31B

BAC:

$65.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USB achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, USB has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 3.75%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


USB

YTD

-4.96%

1M

17.59%

6M

-7.95%

1Y

13.51%

5Y*

11.11%

10Y*

3.75%

BAC

YTD

2.33%

1M

19.46%

6M

-3.27%

1Y

16.55%

5Y*

17.21%

10Y*

12.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

USB vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of USB is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of USB is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of USB is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of USB is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of USB is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of USB is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

USB vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current USB Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USB and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

USB vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

USB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than BAC's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
USB
U.S. Bancorp
4.43%4.14%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%2.15%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.28%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

USB vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USB drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USB and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

USB vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

USB vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between U.S. Bancorp and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
10.35B
46.99B
(USB) Total Revenue
(BAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USB vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between U.S. Bancorp and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
61.7%
58.2%
(USB) Gross Margin
(BAC) Gross Margin
USB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 6.39B and revenue of 10.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.37B and revenue of 46.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

USB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.16B and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 9.60B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

USB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.