PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USB vs. CIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

USB vs. CIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bancolombia S.A. (CIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USB achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly lower than CIB's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, USB has underperformed CIB with an annualized return of 6.64%, while CIB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.75% annualized return.


USB

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
4.80%
6M
9.83%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
6.64%

CIB

1D
1.30%
1M
10.00%
YTD
14.89%
6M
17.10%
1Y
69.72%
3Y*
51.05%
5Y*
29.38%
10Y*
14.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USB vs. CIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USB
U.S. Bancorp
4.80%16.48%15.62%4.79%-19.13%24.32%-17.85%33.62%-12.36%6.61%
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
14.89%124.16%13.78%22.08%-0.31%-20.69%-22.31%47.45%-0.72%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between USB and CIB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 1995

0.25

The correlation between USB and CIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USB:

$86.07B

CIB:

$17.04B

EPS

USB:

$5.02

CIB:

$29.17K

PE Ratio

USB:

11.03

CIB:

0.00

PS Ratio

USB:

1.99

CIB:

0.00

PB Ratio

USB:

1.46

CIB:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

USB:

$43.34B

CIB:

$43.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

USB:

$27.22B

CIB:

$25.71T

EBITDA (TTM)

USB:

$10.34B

CIB:

$10.37T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USB vs. CIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USB
USB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
USB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
USB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CIB
CIB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USB vs. CIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bancolombia S.A. (CIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USBCIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.93

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

7.27

-2.84

USB vs. CIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the CIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USB and CIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USBCIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.20

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.90

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.41

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.25

+0.10

Drawdowns

USB vs. CIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USB drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, smaller than the maximum CIB drawdown of -93.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USB and CIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBCIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.08%

-93.77%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.21%

-23.95%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-23.95%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.13%

-46.85%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.13%

-70.38%

+18.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-13.55%

+5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-32.62%

+16.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

9.63%

-3.09%

Volatility

USB vs. CIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Bancorp (USB) is 7.92%, while Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that USB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBCIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

12.58%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

26.42%

-9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

31.85%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.82%

32.68%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.31%

35.74%

-5.43%

Dividends

USB vs. CIB - Dividend Comparison

USB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than CIB's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
1.70%6.90%10.96%10.92%10.68%0.87%4.01%2.41%3.62%3.21%3.21%4.49%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
3.72%3.82%4.14%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%

Financials

USB vs. CIB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between U.S. Bancorp and Bancolombia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T20222023202420252026
10.84B
10.46T
(USB) Total Revenue
(CIB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USB vs. CIB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between U.S. Bancorp and Bancolombia S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
61.7%
59.2%
Portfolio components
USB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 6.68B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

CIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

USB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.69B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.

CIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

USB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 1.95B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.

CIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


USB and CIB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIB has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to USB (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USB dropped -76.08% vs CIB's -93.77%.

CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USB and CIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer