PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIB vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIBRF
YTD Return13.42%37.10%
1Y Return34.75%79.42%
3Y Return (Ann)8.59%6.11%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.02%13.26%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.50%13.42%
Sharpe Ratio1.402.64
Sortino Ratio2.023.72
Omega Ratio1.241.46
Calmar Ratio0.902.08
Martin Ratio4.6714.79
Ulcer Index7.73%5.19%
Daily Std Dev25.80%29.07%
Max Drawdown-93.43%-92.65%
Current Drawdown-19.50%-2.62%

Fundamentals


CIBRF
Market Cap$7.95B$23.29B
EPS$5.61$1.79
PE Ratio5.7414.31
PEG Ratio1.654.80
Total Revenue (TTM)$29.78T$8.07B
Gross Profit (TTM)$22.85T$8.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$590.62B$1.45B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CIB and RF is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIB vs. RF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIB achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 37.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CIB has underperformed RF with an annualized return of -0.50%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
753.80%
453.28%
CIB
RF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIB vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIB, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIB, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIB, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIB, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIB, currently valued at 4.67, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.67
RF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 3.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 14.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.79

CIB vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIB and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.40
2.64
CIB
RF

Dividends

CIB vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than RF's 3.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
10.99%10.92%10.68%0.87%2.99%2.41%3.62%3.23%3.21%4.81%3.19%3.29%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
3.79%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

CIB vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIB drawdown since its inception was -93.43%, roughly equal to the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-19.50%
-2.62%
CIB
RF

Volatility

CIB vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) is 9.37%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that CIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.37%
12.39%
CIB
RF

Financials

CIB vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bancolombia S.A. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items