PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. FIJDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly lower than FIJDX's -2.05% return.


USAGX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-9.51%
1Y
51.88%
3Y*
40.64%
5Y*
19.10%
10Y*
11.85%

FIJDX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-6.85%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
40.75%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-5.41%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%2.28%
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
-2.05%143.25%15.10%-0.26%-13.32%-10.33%27.00%35.74%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and FIJDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.97

The correlation between USAGX and FIJDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. FIJDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FIJDX
FIJDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FIJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USAGXFIJDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

3.96

+0.08

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FIJDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and FIJDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than FIJDX's maximum drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and FIJDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXFIJDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-50.43%

-30.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.13%

-35.39%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.13%

-35.39%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-45.91%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.20%

-28.27%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.06%

-18.53%

-24.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.29%

13.09%

+0.20%

Volatility

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) is 16.09%, while Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that USAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIJDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXFIJDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.09%

17.03%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.69%

37.82%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.63%

45.08%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.31%

34.08%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.93%

34.63%

-1.70%

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FIJDX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. FIJDX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than FIJDX's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
5.23%2.17%3.63%1.16%0.38%1.71%4.54%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.25%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, USAGX and FIJDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIJDX has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to USAGX (16.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs FIJDX's -50.43%.

USAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and FIJDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer