FIJDX vs. IAUI
FIJDX (Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both funds - FIJDX is a Gold fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FIJDX returned 52.96% vs 15.59% for IAUI. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIJDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJDX achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's -3.56% return.
FIJDX
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 39.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -5.45%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | -1.21% | 52.47% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -3.56% | 20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJDX and IAUI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FIJDX and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIJDX vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
FIJDX
IAUI
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIJDX | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.77 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 2.32 | +1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -20.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJDX | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -20.43% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.39% | -20.43% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.66% | -18.21% | -9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -4.07% | -14.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.97% | 6.75% | +6.22% |
Volatility
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) has a higher volatility of 17.24% compared to NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) at 7.56%. This indicates that FIJDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIJDX | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.24% | 7.56% | +9.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.81% | 19.70% | +18.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.02% | 21.34% | +23.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 20.98% | +13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 20.98% | +13.66% |
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIJDX vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than IAUI's 14.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | 5.18% | 2.17% | 3.63% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 0.53% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 14.48% | 6.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIJDX and IAUI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIJDX has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to IAUI (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs IAUI's -20.43%.
FIJDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIJDX and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer