URNM vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
URNM and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both URNM and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
URNM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URNM vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 15.05% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 14.63% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 9.01% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with URNM having a 15.05% return and LIT slightly lower at 14.63%.
URNM
- 1D
- 8.06%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 101.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- —
LIT
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 92.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URNM vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URNM vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
URNM
LIT
URNM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.70 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 3.28 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 5.00 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 19.45 | -10.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.70 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.17 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.24 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and LIT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
URNM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than LIT's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.42% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
URNM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and LIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | -65.91% | +15.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.79% | -17.61% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.78% | -65.91% | +15.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.81% | -19.86% | -4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -33.90% | +16.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 4.63% | +6.45% |
Volatility
URNM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 11.99%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URNM | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | 11.99% | +6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.47% | 24.73% | +15.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | 34.57% | +16.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.02% | 31.68% | +16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.76% | 30.50% | +16.26% |