URNM vs. AOR
Compare and contrast key facts about NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR).
URNM and AOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both URNM and AOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URNM or AOR.
Performance
URNM vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 11.27% return.
URNM
-0.50%
-8.30%
-14.96%
0.87%
N/A
N/A
AOR
11.27%
-0.67%
5.67%
17.13%
6.69%
6.28%
Key characteristics
| URNM | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.01 | 2.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.29 | 3.12 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.01 | 2.20 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.02 | 13.89 |
| Ulcer Index | 17.01% | 1.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.33% | 7.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.55% | -24.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.33% | -1.39% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URNM vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and AOR is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URNM vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URNM vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than AOR's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 3.65% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.47% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% | 2.11% | 1.92% |
Drawdowns
URNM vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and AOR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URNM vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.13%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.