URFFX vs. USAGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) and USAGX (USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund) are both mutual funds - URFFX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Victory, while USAGX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, URFFX returned 10.35%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for USAGX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URFFX charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for USAGX.

Performance

URFFX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URFFX achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, URFFX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.

URFFX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 12.46%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

USAGX

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -1.56%
• 6M: 4.39%
• 1Y: 57.01%
• 3Y*: 39.62%
• 5Y*: 17.43%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URFFX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	11.95%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	-1.56%	156.06%	10.76%	6.73%	-11.80%	-10.14%	25.85%	42.97%	-12.26%	9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between URFFX and USAGX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2008	0.36

The correlation between URFFX and USAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

URFFX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

USAGX

USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URFFX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URFFX	USAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.35	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.76	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	1.91	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	4.90	+9.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URFFX vs. USAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the USAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URFFX and USAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URFFX	USAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.35	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.53	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.40	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.18	+0.28

Drawdowns

URFFX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URFFX drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URFFX and USAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	URFFX	USAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-80.89%	+36.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-30.12%	+22.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.14%	-30.12%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.76%	-45.72%	+21.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.97%	-51.03%	+21.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-26.33%	+25.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-43.08%	+37.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	11.72%	-9.92%

Volatility

URFFX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) is 3.35%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that URFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URFFX	USAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	14.31%	-10.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.72%	35.35%	-26.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	42.70%	-31.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	32.86%	-18.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.36%	32.68%	-18.32%

URFFX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URFFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

URFFX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison

URFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than USAGX's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.77%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	2.45%	0.95%	0.84%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URFFX and USAGX in my portfolio?

URFFX and USAGX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URFFX or USAGX?

USAGX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to URFFX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URFFX dropped -44.25% vs USAGX's -80.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.