PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URE vs. MVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URE vs. MVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 28.55% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has underperformed MVV with an annualized return of 3.72%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


URE

1D
1.83%
1M
4.44%
YTD
23.42%
6M
23.42%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
-3.33%
10Y*
3.72%

MVV

1D
1.36%
1M
7.43%
YTD
28.55%
6M
24.94%
1Y
46.23%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URE vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
23.42%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
28.55%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%

Correlation

The correlation between URE and MVV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between URE and MVV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

URE vs. MVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URE
MVV

Real Estate

68.2%
7.5%

Financial Services

8.9%
14.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.8%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Energy

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

8.7%

Industrials

-

25.1%

Technology

-

15.8%

Utilities

-

3.1%

Real Estate

URE
68.2%
MVV
7.5%

Financial Services

URE
8.9%
MVV
14.3%

Basic Materials

URE
1.3%
MVV
4.8%

Communication Services

URE

-

MVV
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

URE

-

MVV
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

URE

-

MVV
3.7%

Energy

URE

-

MVV
5.5%

Healthcare

URE

-

MVV
8.7%

Industrials

URE

-

MVV
25.1%

Technology

URE

-

MVV
15.8%

Utilities

URE

-

MVV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URE vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UREMVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.63

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

9.01

-6.91

URE vs. MVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the MVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and MVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URE vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MVV's maximum drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and MVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UREMVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-85.54%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-17.68%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.77%

-44.80%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.66%

-45.53%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-69.19%

-1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.75%

0.00%

-48.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.49%

-20.52%

-43.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

5.16%

+1.67%

Volatility

URE vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) have volatilities of 9.54% and 9.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UREMVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

9.98%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

23.46%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

31.91%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.38%

39.74%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.58%

42.40%

-1.82%

URE vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URE and MVV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

URE vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than MVV's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.66%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
1.90%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


URE and MVV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVV has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to URE (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs MVV's -85.54%.

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.23% vs 3.72% for URE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, URE has been the lower-risk option at 9.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URE and MVV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.66% for MVV.

URE is categorized as REIT, while MVV is Leveraged Equities. URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%).

MVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URE and MVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer