UPST vs. AMDL
UPST (Upstart Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, UPST returned -40.58% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UPST vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPST achieves a -30.73% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.
UPST
- 1D
- -6.48%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -30.73%
- 6M
- -33.13%
- 1Y
- -40.58%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- -28.67%
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- 8.25%
- 1M
- 135.69%
- YTD
- 395.18%
- 6M
- 371.52%
- 1Y
- 1,189.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPST vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UPST Upstart Holdings, Inc. | -30.73% | -28.98% | 155.05% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 395.18% | 103.00% | -69.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPST and AMDL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPST vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
UPST
AMDL
UPST vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPST | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.63 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 21.43 | -22.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 42.08 | -42.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPST | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 9.30 | -9.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.56 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
UPST vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPST drawdown since its inception was -96.90%, which is greater than AMDL's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPST and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPST | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.90% | -88.63% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.21% | -56.13% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.23% | 0.00% | -92.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -48.58% | -27.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.66% | 28.53% | +18.13% |
Volatility
UPST vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) is 20.07%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that UPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPST | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.07% | 46.02% | -25.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.56% | 94.09% | -44.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.71% | 129.41% | -58.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.75% | 116.59% | -12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.03% | 116.59% | -2.56% |
Dividends
UPST vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UPST nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UPST and AMDL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to UPST (20.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPST dropped -96.90% vs AMDL's -88.63%.
AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPST and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer