PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPSD vs. DUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPSD vs. DUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPSD achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than DUBS's 12.45% return.


UPSD

1D
0.30%
1M
4.68%
6M
6.70%
YTD
8.09%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DUBS

1D
0.81%
1M
2.57%
6M
11.57%
YTD
12.45%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPSD vs. DUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
8.09%12.83%-4.67%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
12.45%19.28%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between UPSD and DUBS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.90

The correlation between UPSD and DUBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPSD vs. DUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPSD
UPSD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
UPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPSD vs. DUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPSDDUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.12

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

13.70

-8.04

UPSD vs. DUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the DUBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPSD and DUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPSD vs. DUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than DUBS's maximum drawdown of -18.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and DUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSDDUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.85%

-18.48%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-8.29%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.67%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-1.95%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.89%

+1.14%

Volatility

UPSD vs. DUBS - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSDDUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.52%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

10.71%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

13.49%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

14.66%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

14.66%

+6.18%

UPSD vs. DUBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPSD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DUBS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPSD vs. DUBS - Dividend Comparison

UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than DUBS's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.99%2.06%2.52%1.14%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
0.66%0.67%0.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPSD and DUBS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUBS has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to UPSD (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPSD dropped -23.85% vs DUBS's -18.48%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.79% vs 17.13% for UPSD. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, UPSD has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.79% return vs 17.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.66% for UPSD.

UPSD is categorized as Actively Managed, while DUBS is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UPSD and 0.39% for DUBS.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPSD and DUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer