UPSD vs. SCUB
UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPSD charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.
Performance
UPSD vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPSD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSD vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 16.72% |
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPSD and SCUB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPSD vs. SCUB — Risk / Return Rank
UPSD
SCUB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPSD vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPSD | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPSD vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and SCUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPSD | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -0.08% | -23.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -0.01% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility
UPSD vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPSD | SCUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 0.79% | +13.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 0.79% | +20.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 0.79% | +20.05% |
UPSD vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPSD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPSD vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison
UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SCUB's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPSD and SCUB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.
SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.66% for UPSD.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UPSD and 0.30% for SCUB.
Find the right allocation for UPSD and SCUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer