DUBS vs. BSJO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUBS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus, while BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. DUBS is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.

Performance

DUBS vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DUBS

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 32.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	11.44%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

DUBS vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS

DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 79
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUBS	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUBS	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	—	—

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and BSJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUBS	BSJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.48%	0.00%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	0.00%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUBS	BSJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	0.00%	+12.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	0.00%	+14.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.55%	0.00%	+14.55%

DUBS vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUBS vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	1.94%	2.06%	2.52%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DUBS or BSJO?

On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUBS or BSJO?

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUBS or BSJO?

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between DUBS and BSJO?

DUBS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BSJO is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.42% for BSJO.