DUBS vs. NANC
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUBS returned 21.30%/yr vs 22.72%/yr for NANC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NANC.
Performance
DUBS vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's 8.92% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NANC
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 24.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUBS vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 11.21% | 19.28% | 24.08% | 7.89% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 8.92% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and NANC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DUBS and NANC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUBS vs. NANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUBS
NANC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DUBS
NANC
Financial Services
DUBS
NANC
Communication Services
DUBS
NANC
Consumer Cyclical
DUBS
NANC
Healthcare
DUBS
NANC
Industrials
DUBS
NANC
Consumer Defensive
DUBS
NANC
Energy
DUBS
NANC
-
Utilities
DUBS
NANC
Real Estate
DUBS
NANC
-
Basic Materials
DUBS
NANC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
NANC
DUBS vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 2.01 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 8.16 | +8.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum NANC drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -20.94% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -12.21% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | -20.94% | +2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.85% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -2.66% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.01% | -1.19% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 5.13%, while Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.65% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 11.42% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 14.37% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 16.86% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 16.86% | -2.16% |
DUBS vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.96% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DUBS and NANC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NANC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to DUBS (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs NANC's -20.94%.
On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 22.72% vs 21.30% for DUBS. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 22.72% return vs 21.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Subversive. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.72% for NANC.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer