UPSD vs. TACN
UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UPSD charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.
Performance
UPSD vs. TACN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPSD achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than TACN's 10.54% return.
UPSD
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.90%
TACN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $184.69K | $112.68K | $82.44K | |
| $285.86K | $253.51K | $392.48K |
UPSD vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 7.32% | 0.36% |
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 10.54% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPSD and TACN is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPSD vs. TACN — Risk / Return Rank
UPSD
TACN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPSD vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPSD | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPSD vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than TACN's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and TACN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPSD | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -10.98% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.53% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -2.32% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility
UPSD vs. TACN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPSD | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 17.14% | -2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 17.14% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 17.14% | +3.45% |
UPSD vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPSD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPSD vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison
UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.67% | 0.67% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPSD and TACN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.
UPSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UPSD and 0.20% for TACN.
Find the right allocation for UPSD and TACN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer