UPGD vs. VXF
UPGD (Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - UPGD tracks the Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPGD returned 10.03%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for VXF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPGD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
UPGD vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, UPGD has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 10.03%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.
UPGD
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
VXF
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
UPGD vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF | 11.58% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 16.09% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGD and VXF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between UPGD and VXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UPGD vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPGD
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPGD
VXF
Industrials
UPGD
VXF
Consumer Defensive
UPGD
VXF
Technology
UPGD
VXF
Utilities
UPGD
VXF
Healthcare
UPGD
VXF
Basic Materials
UPGD
VXF
Communication Services
UPGD
VXF
Financial Services
UPGD
VXF
Energy
UPGD
-
VXF
Real Estate
UPGD
-
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGD vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
UPGD
VXF
UPGD vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPGD | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.29 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 8.01 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPGD vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, roughly equal to the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGD | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -58.03% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -10.21% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -26.92% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -36.39% | +12.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -41.72% | -8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.94% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -9.52% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.91% | +0.02% |
Volatility
UPGD vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) is 4.86%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that UPGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGD | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.15% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 13.23% | -2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 17.81% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 22.43% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 22.26% | -0.72% |
UPGD vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGD vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than VXF's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGD and VXF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXF has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to UPGD (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 11.98% vs 10.03% for UPGD. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, UPGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UPGD.
UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.
UPGD tracks Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.05% for VXF.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPGD and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer