PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPGD vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPGD vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, UPGD has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 10.20%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


UPGD

1D
0.28%
1M
6.09%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.94%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
10.20%

VXF

1D
1.13%
1M
4.62%
YTD
15.07%
6M
13.20%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGD vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPGD
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
11.28%8.89%13.28%15.65%-13.17%24.09%6.21%32.02%-14.84%13.31%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
15.07%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGD and VXF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.89

The correlation between UPGD and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPGD vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPGD
VXF

Industrials

32.2%
19.3%

Technology

22.5%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

19.2%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
2.7%

Utilities

6.3%
2.0%

Healthcare

5.9%
13.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
14.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Energy

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Industrials

UPGD
32.2%
VXF
19.3%

Technology

UPGD
22.5%
VXF
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

UPGD
19.2%
VXF
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

UPGD
14.0%
VXF
2.7%

Utilities

UPGD
6.3%
VXF
2.0%

Healthcare

UPGD
5.9%
VXF
13.3%

Communication Services

UPGD
2.2%
VXF
3.3%

Financial Services

UPGD
0.0%
VXF
14.6%

Basic Materials

UPGD

-

VXF
4.2%

Energy

UPGD

-

VXF
5.1%

Real Estate

UPGD

-

VXF
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPGD vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGD
UPGD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
UPGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UPGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGD vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPGDVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.97

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

10.54

-4.30

UPGD vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGD and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPGDVXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.77

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.30

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.54

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.46

-0.11

Drawdowns

UPGD vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, roughly equal to the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPGDVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-58.03%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-10.21%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-26.92%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-36.39%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.20%

-41.72%

-8.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-9.55%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.87%

+0.05%

Volatility

UPGD vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) is 4.00%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that UPGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPGDVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.84%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

12.48%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

17.20%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

22.33%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

22.29%

-0.65%

UPGD vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPGD vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than VXF's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UPGD
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
1.57%1.75%1.28%1.39%0.72%0.52%0.28%0.20%1.43%0.00%1.55%0.93%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.01%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPGD and VXF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to UPGD (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.10% vs 10.20% for UPGD. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, UPGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UPGD.

UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.

UPGD tracks Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.05% for VXF.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPGD and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer