UPGD vs. SPHQ
UPGD (Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPGD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPGD returned 10.20%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPGD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, UPGD has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.20%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
UPGD
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF | 11.28% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGD and SPHQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between UPGD and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPGD
SPHQ
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
UPGD
SPHQ
Technology
UPGD
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
UPGD
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
UPGD
SPHQ
Utilities
UPGD
SPHQ
Healthcare
UPGD
SPHQ
Communication Services
UPGD
SPHQ
Financial Services
UPGD
SPHQ
Basic Materials
UPGD
-
SPHQ
Energy
UPGD
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
UPGD
-
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGD vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
UPGD
SPHQ
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPGD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.67 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 11.39 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPGD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.89 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.90 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.84 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -57.83% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -8.90% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -16.57% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -25.04% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -31.60% | -18.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -10.70% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.08% | +0.84% |
Volatility
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.33%. This indicates that UPGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGD | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.33% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 10.18% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 12.62% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 16.45% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 17.86% | +3.78% |
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGD vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGD and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGD has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SPHQ (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.04% vs 10.20% for UPGD. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UPGD.
UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
UPGD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. UPGD tracks Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPGD and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer