PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPGD vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UPGD has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 10.04%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.


UPGD

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.10%
6M
7.04%
YTD
10.95%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
10.04%
ALL TIME*
8.43%

TQQQ

1D
2.09%
1M
-11.90%
6M
20.14%
YTD
23.06%
1Y
56.87%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
39.46%
ALL TIME*
42.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.37B$4.57B$5.33B
$107.99K$276.67K$151.22K

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPGD
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
10.95%8.89%13.28%15.65%-13.17%24.09%6.21%32.02%-14.84%13.31%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
23.06%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGD and TQQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between UPGD and TQQQ has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPGD
TQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

25.1%
12.3%

Industrials

24.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

19.1%
7.7%

Technology

11.8%
53.8%

Utilities

7.9%
1.4%

Healthcare

6.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.1%

Communication Services

1.5%
15.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UPGD
25.1%
TQQQ
12.3%

Industrials

UPGD
24.4%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

UPGD
19.1%
TQQQ
7.7%

Technology

UPGD
11.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

UPGD
7.9%
TQQQ
1.4%

Healthcare

UPGD
6.4%
TQQQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

UPGD
3.7%
TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

UPGD
1.5%
TQQQ
15.8%

Financial Services

UPGD
0.0%
TQQQ
0.2%

Energy

UPGD

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

UPGD

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPGD vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UPGD
UPGD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UPGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UPGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPGDTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.29

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

3.60

+1.78

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGD and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPGDTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-81.66%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-36.97%

+26.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-58.04%

+41.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-81.66%

+57.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.20%

-81.66%

+31.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-25.74%

+23.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-18.49%

+8.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

13.24%

-10.32%

Volatility

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) is 4.00%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that UPGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPGDTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

20.41%

-16.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

47.79%

-36.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

57.62%

-43.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

68.04%

-49.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

66.57%

-45.02%

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPGD vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.58%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
UPGD
Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
1.57%1.75%1.28%1.39%0.72%0.52%0.28%0.20%1.43%0.00%1.55%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPGD and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to UPGD (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs 10.04% for UPGD. On fees, UPGD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, UPGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPGD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.

UPGD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. UPGD tracks Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.95% for TQQQ.

UPGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPGD and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer