UPAL vs. AGQ

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAL is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by ProShares, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). UPAL is actively managed, while AGQ is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPAL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.

Performance

UPAL vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UPAL

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -22.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGQ

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -42.40%
• YTD: -57.51%
• 6M: -60.40%
• 1Y: 40.53%
• 3Y*: 34.73%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: 2.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPAL vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF	-43.92%
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	-50.29%

Correlation

The correlation between UPAL and AGQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

UPAL vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPAL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AGQ

AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 20
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPAL vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPAL	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.91	—

Drawdowns

UPAL vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and AGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPAL	AGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.54%	-98.16%	+49.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-84.08%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.92%	-90.98%	+47.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.97%	-79.88%	+54.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	44.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UPAL	AGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	31.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	135.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.57%	124.64%	-44.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.57%	75.82%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.57%	66.27%	+14.30%

UPAL vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPAL vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	0.00%
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPAL and AGQ in my portfolio?

UPAL and AGQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UPAL or AGQ?

On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPAL or AGQ?

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPAL or AGQ?

UPAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.

What is the main difference between UPAL and AGQ?

UPAL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while AGQ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPAL and 0.93% for AGQ.