UPAL vs. CXRN
UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPAL vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPAL
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 11.23%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -9.43%
- 1Y
- -12.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPAL vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | -41.70% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAL and CXRN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAL vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
UPAL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CXRN
UPAL vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAL vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -53.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -53.17% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.70% | -43.68% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -31.45% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.84% | — |
Volatility
UPAL vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.47% | 36.99% | +42.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.47% | 37.85% | +41.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.47% | 37.85% | +41.62% |
UPAL vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPAL and CXRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPAL vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than CXRN's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.38% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAL and CXRN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAL and CXRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.26% for UPAL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Teucrium.
Find the right allocation for UPAL and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer