UPAL vs. CXRN
UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPAL vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPAL
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -22.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXRN
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- -24.70%
- 6M
- -25.20%
- 1Y
- -27.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPAL vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | -43.92% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -24.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAL and CXRN is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAL vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
UPAL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CXRN
UPAL vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -2.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAL vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -53.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -53.17% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.92% | -53.17% | +9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.97% | -30.89% | +5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility
UPAL vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAL | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.57% | 36.70% | +43.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.57% | 37.08% | +43.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.57% | 37.08% | +43.49% |
UPAL vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPAL and CXRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPAL vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than CXRN's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.86% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAL and CXRN have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAL and CXRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.27% for UPAL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Teucrium.
Find the right allocation for UPAL and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer