UPAL vs. UPLT
UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and UPLT (ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF) are both Leveraged Commodities funds from ProShares. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPAL vs. UPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPAL
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPLT
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPAL vs. UPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | -41.54% |
UPLT ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF | -45.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAL and UPLT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAL vs. UPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF (UPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAL vs. UPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, roughly equal to the maximum UPLT drawdown of -49.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and UPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAL | UPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -49.98% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.54% | -47.64% | +6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.59% | -26.18% | -1.41% |
Volatility
UPAL vs. UPLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAL | UPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.08% | 79.32% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.08% | 79.32% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.08% | 79.32% | -0.24% |
UPAL vs. UPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPAL and UPLT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPAL vs. UPLT - Dividend Comparison
UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than UPLT's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | 0.26% |
UPLT ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAL and UPLT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAL and UPLT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UPLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.26% for UPAL.
Find the right allocation for UPAL and UPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer